For hospitals and clinical teams

A shared evidence workflow—introduced with guardrails.

Evaluate how source-visible synthesis can support clinicians across departments without turning an AI response into institutional policy.

Available today

A practical foundation for a limited clinical pilot.

The starting point is the existing Lymph workflow: verified access, organizations, durable evidence work, and inspectable sources.

Support practitioner verification and organization-based access for participating clinical teams.

Organize clinicians and evidence work within institutional workspaces.

Retain durable conversations and operation records with source-visible responses.

Start small

Select a department, cohort, and evidence-heavy use case.

Agree deidentification, source, verification, and escalation boundaries.

Review real usage, safety feedback, evidence gaps, and workflow fit.

Expand only after clinical and governance teams review the pilot.

Now

Use the current web application with defined participants and deidentified scenarios.

Scoped separately

SSO, HIS/EHR integration, local protocols, deployment topology, and formal compliance requirements require separate validation and agreement.

Questions from clinical and governance teams

Does Lymph make clinical decisions?

No. Lymph supports evidence examination. The treating clinician and institution retain responsibility for interpretation and decisions.

Can clinicians enter identifiable patient information?

Does Lymph integrate with our HIS or EHR today?

Can we control sources and protocols?

What does a pilot look like?

For clinical and governance teams

Use a 30-minute discussion to define whether a structured pilot is appropriate.